Friday February 05, 2010
Tina Brown’s digital-first book venture is a great idea — but a little confusing
Beast Books will be longer than conventional long-form magazine articles but shorter than conventional nonfiction books. They will be published digitally and distributed on multiple platforms, and will soon thereafter be available as handy paperbacks. They’ll provide megabyte edification—and high-voltage provocation—with the ambition of enlarging our understanding of the complexities we chronicle every day at the fast and furious pace of breaking news on The Daily Beast. [via thedailybeast.com]
I was just having a conversation with some tech-savvy friends last night about how the Internet has taken over practically every form of content, except long-form writing—and how the e-reader revolution is coming for that now, too. For that reason, I think the idea behind Beast Books—stories too long for the browser being offered as digital-first e-books—is incredibly smart. E-books, at this point in time, are sort of a middle way. Less substantial than actual books, releasing one still has more gravitas than just posting something on the web in HTML. And you can charge for them. (Maybe.)
That said, Beast Books’ first outing, “Wingnuts,” demonstrates how confused (and confusing) this nascent market still is. Brown says the books “will be published digitally and distributed on multiple platforms, and will soon thereafter be available as handy paperbacks.”
Okay. Which platforms and for how much? The call-outs on the site say $15.95, but the link takes you to Amazon, where the book is available for the now famous price-point of $9.99 for Kindle and $10.85 for the paperback, which will be released on February 23. So the book starts digital and then ladders up to the premium in-store price of $15.95? Does the business plan call for anyone to actually acquire the book this way and for this price, or is this a phantom product meant only to justify the price of the digital download? Alternatively, perhaps Brown will go all the way, and ladder up to a hardcover release, $27.95, for the spring. (I seriously doubt this.)
In any case, I like a model that suggests that a print book is an enhanced e-book, rather than looking at e-books as degraded print books.
Posted via web from The Hanex
Posted by jim at 12:59 PM || Comments
Saturday January 30, 2010
Free your Kindle and my books will follow
Since today is Hate Amazon Day—thanks to the company’s decision to yank Macmillan’s titles from the Kindle store over a pricing dispute—I thought it might be a good time to revise my guide to downloading my e-books—plus thousands of others—on various platforms.
Last time, I covered the process for the iPhone, which has changed. But let’s start with the Kindle.
It is relatively easy to download both my free e-books, 2006’s Single and 2009’s Cassingle, directly to your Kindle via Feedbooks, although it does require the use of the web browser, which Amazon hides as “Experimental” since it competes with their business model. My brother-in-law didn’t even know his Kindle had a web browser when I downloaded my books to his Kindle for him over the holidays. That’s a speed bump, to be sure, but Hate Amazon Day 2010 might be just what consumers need to hunt down the browser and free themselves (if only a little) from Bezos et. al.
The path to opening the browser is Home > Menu > Experimental > Basic Web. (Here are Amazon’s instructions.) Once there, type http://www.feedbooks.mobi into the browser’s address bar. On that page, type “Hanas” into the search box and voila, my two books show up second and third on the list, right after Hans Christian Andersen, whose work mine in no way resembles. And, if you insist, you can browse the thousands of other free books—both classic and original—available via Feedbooks, which Amazon will be powerless to yank from the web. You can also download a dedicated Kindle guide from that page, which will make Feedbooks’ catalog even more readily accessible.
Now for the iPhone and the iPod Touch. The path to my (and other) books is basically the same as it was the last time I detailed it. Download Stanza (uh oh, an Amazon product; more on this in a second.) Hit the “Get Books” tab, navigate to “Feedbooks - Free Content,” open the search bar (with the little magnifying glass), search for “Hanas,” and there I am again, right under Hans.
But is Stanza an option on Hate Amazon Day? A good question. At least for now, Stanza is open to a DRM-free EPUB provider like Feedbooks, so I’m going to let it slide. For that reason and because I’m a shameless opportunist. Alternatively, if you’re running an Android phone, you can search for me in the Aldiko catalog, which includes Feedbooks. Or you could download the .pdf and print the damn thing out. That would show ‘em.
Posted via web from The Hanex
Posted by jim at 11:10 AM || Comments
Tuesday January 12, 2010
In storytelling, will media be the new narrative?
Having covered the advertising industry during a time of enormous change, the change now happening in the publishing industry sometimes appears to me like a slow-motion car crash. I feel like I know what’s going to happen. (I could be wrong, of course, but we’ll see.) The book world’s delayed discovery of platform agnosticism is just one example. Here’s another.
Six or seven years ago, it became fashionable in advertising to say that “media is the new creative.” What this meant was that how a message is delivered had become such a part of the story (and the business problem) that it no longer made sense to separate the two. In, say, 1985 talking about them separately had made perfect sense, just as it had made sense to talk about art and copy separately in 1955. As late as 2000, the creative was the creative and the media was the media. It made sense for someone to hand you a reel with five commercials on it and ask if it was a good campaign. All the info you needed to answer was on the reel. By 2005, however, this had become increasingly difficult. To really understand campaigns—to even appreciate them—you had to know their media story. The classic example is BMW Films, a series of shorts by big-name directors that were distributed via the web in 2002. Famously, the campaign was denied a Media Lion at the International Advertising Festival in Cannes because all the media jurors thought it was a creative idea. Three years later, the festival introduced a whole new category, the Titanium Lions, to honor these sorts of cross-platform campaigns. The first honoree? BMW Films.
Meanwhile, media becoming the new creative led to all sorts of upheaval. Ted Sann, seeming creative-director-for-life at TV-centric warhorse BBDO, was replaced by David Lubars, the guy whose agency came up with BMW Films. Old line creative types grumbled that “creative is still the new creative” while traditional media companies complained that even though media was supposedly the new creative, they weren’t winning any damn awards because they kept shoveling ads into magazines and onto TV while really interesting modes of delivery were being cooked up in, you guessed it, creative departments. But the long and the short if it is that in 2000, I covered ad campaigns by just showing people “the work,” as they say, but by 2005, the work had to be put into its media context for anyone to be able to judge if it was innovative or interesting. Where did the work appear? How was it discovered? How did users interact with it? It was like advertising went from 2D to 3D overnight.
I believe some percentage of narrative literature is about to go 3D as well. (I say some percentage, because I agree with Richard Nash that immersive reading will stick around.) What does this mean? It means that there will be innovation in ways to deliver and tell stories—not just in the way these stories are written—and that this will be an annoyance to some and an opportunity for others. Media will become the new narrative. Old line publishing types will grumble that “writing is the old and new narrative” even as they are bypassed by insurgents who see that how a story is delivered is as much a part of storytelling as writing. There will be a strong urge to dismiss all non-traditional delivery systems as gimmicks that somehow distract from the “pure” story—even by the innovators themselves. Electric Literature’s Andy Hunter wrote of the Moody Twitter experiment, “We regret that less attention was paid to the content of Rick’s story than its mode of delivery—although that may have been inevitable.” But he can’t mean that. Or he shouldn’t mean it. This is just, I suspect, transitional insecurity. Misplaced apologia. In five years—or less—book awards will have categories for innovations like this, and one day media might be accepted as being as essential to story as plot, character, and point of view.
Posted via web from The Hanex
Posted by jim at 07:42 AM || Comments
Thursday December 31, 2009
2009: The Year in Hanas
The last day of the year. A bad day for work—where is everyone?—but a good one for taking stock. The 2009 bottom line? My e-books have been downloaded more than 3,000 times this year, half of those downloads coming in the last four months. I’m confident that, with current and new projects, I will distribute 10,000 e-books in 2010, but I’m hoping for 20,000 or more. 3K isn’t a huge number, but if I were a start-up literary magazine, I’d be happy with it. And come to think of it, I guess that’s what I (and a lot of other writers) have become. But that’s just the numbers. Here are the highlights of the, um, content.
“The Arab Bank”A short story set in Cannes during the Cannes Film Festival that utilizes Google Maps and Street View. Because of its relationship to a real place and event, I thought it would be fun to serialize the story during the festival, so I released installments—with notifications via email, RSS, Twitter, and Facebook—each day from May 13 to May 24, 2009. Top Novellas
Blogger John Madera asked a bunch of writers to name their favorite novellas. Here’s what I had to say. Interview at Small Stories
An interview about my 2006 e-book collection Single and “The Arab Bank.” “You Are Not Going to Be Famous”
In July, the Post printed this updated version of my Adult Education talk “You Are Not Going to be Famous” in its Sunday op-ed section. You can see the video of the original talk here. “Christian and Me”
A video based on my talk from the October 7, 2009, installment of Adult Education—wherein I consider the respective careers of myself and my astrological twin Christian Slater.Cassingle
My latest e-book, released in November, includes stories that originally appeared in McSweeney’s, Fence, Bridge, and Twelve Stories—plus “The Arab Bank.” Review of Cassingle
In Toronto’s Eye Weekly, Brian Joseph Davis writes, “As for the future of publishing, it won’t entirely look like Hanas’ experiment in free, but it will look more like it than not. At five stories and 33 pages, Cassingle is aptly titled and rather witty. A combination of original works and stories that have appeared in the likes of Fence and McSweeney’s, it is a good introduction to Hanas’s perfectly designed, well-tuned and aerodynamic tales. … No matter the cut, this is writing that speaks American, in all its complexity.”Fictionaut Five
Earlier this month, I answered a few questions about writing (and golf) at Fictionaut.What’s ahead in the new year? I have a few stories making the rounds that will hopefully find homes — plus a couple on blocks in the garage — as I continue to putter my way toward a full-length story collection. In the spring, I’m hoping to serialize a novella-length work, although the technical and creative ambitions are such that I’m scared to say much more about it. In April, I’ll be joining Brian Joseph Davis and Richard Nash for a reading and a chat about digital publishing at McNally Jackson Books in Manhattan. That’s all I can discern from here. See you … tomorrow.
Posted via email from The Hanex
Posted by jim at 09:48 AM || Comments
Wednesday December 23, 2009
CueCat: My write-in vote for worst publishing idea of the decade
I don’t know if it’s because it’s the end of the year or the end of the decade or the end of publishing, but I’ve been thinking a lot about things that are no longer with us. Not important things — just websites and brands and failed technological solutions. Things like the CueCat.
Who can forget the CueCat? Nine years ago it was going to save publishing (just check the Romenesko logs) by allowing people to scan bar codes in newspapers and magazines and access websites and online coupons without using a keyboard. And it was shaped like a cat. This, of course, was a colossal failure. (I dropped the “C” word in the #ebooksummit hashtag last week to see if anyone remembered this debacle. Either a) no one did, b) people remembered but dared not revisit the folly, or c) they found my use of the hashtag for retro-fail gags obnoxious, which I can respect.) Joel Spolsky’s reaction to the device said it all. “The number of dumb things going on here exceeds my limited ability to grok all at once,” he wrote in 2000 (the “grok” really gives it away, doesn’t it?). “I’m a bit overwhelmed with what a feeble business idea this is.”
But a business it was, for awhile. Forbes, Belo-owned papers like the Dallas Morning News, and even Wired were all in. And now you can’t even get a yuck off of it in a hashtag? Now that’s failure. I note it only because it’s funny — I’d forgotten that it was actually shaped like a cat — and because it serves as a cautionary tale. All kinds of scanners and readers and augmented-reality apps are again taking wing (and more than their share of hype), and — as Spolsky noted then — it’s difficult to see what problem they solve. Typing is just not that difficult. And there might be a form-factor message here for the e-reader market as well. Just because something displays books doesn’t mean it has to look like one, no more than the CueCat needed to look like an actual cat.
Posted via web from The Hanex





